A new study by Bazaarvoice says
folks are now leaning more toward the reTweet than the Tweet but can
you blame them? reTweeting is easy. It’s mindless. Whereas creating new
Tweets takes time and thought.
This chart from The Conversation Index Volume 5 shows that the
proportion of original brand Tweets (the turquoise shaded area) has
dropped to 78% from 85% in 2010. Branded reTweets are on the rise (the
dark bar). Just look at how far we’ve come since 2010. But is this a
good thing or a bad thing?
On the good side, it’s nice to see people spreading the word. Every
reTweet is the start of a new pool of potential customers. The downside
is that reTweets get muddy with every hop. Most Tweets are too long to
begin with so adding a comment in front of a reTweet means some of the
original message will be truncated. If you put your links at the end, as
most do, then you’re asking for that Tweet to spread without this
critical information.
Many people simply RT without any added comments. It preserves the
integrity of the original message but doesn’t inspire receivers to take
note. It’s the difference between cutting an article out of the
newspaper and mailing it to a friend, or mailing it along with your
opinion of the article in a note. The opinion is going to push me to
read the article more than the article itself.
(via)
1 comment:
ugg outlet
ecco shoes outlet
nike outlet
michael kors handbags
coach outlet
pandora outlet
nike huarache
ugg outlet
bills jerseys
nike factory outlet
Post a Comment