Showing posts with label Revenue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revenue. Show all posts

Friday, October 24, 2014

How to Show Marketing’s Impact on Revenue

National and local internet marketing experts are frequently faced with this challenge: How does one effectively connect marketing strategy with returns?
When a marketing campaign goes viral, it’s rather easy to see the returns of that campaign. However, it’s not every day a marketing campaign takes off like the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. More commonly, campaigns have a substantial impact and it’s these campaigns that are more difficult to measure returns.

How to Show Marketing’s Impact on Revenue
Know What Metrics Are Most Important to Track

In any internet marketing campaign, there are unknown variables. It’s unreasonable to track exactly what past customers say. Similarly, it is also unreasonable to separate self-report data from customers. Instead of tracking all metrics and sales channels, take a methodical approach. Choose a few different channels and a few different reliable metrics. For the record, self-report data from customers is notoriously unreliable. Look at customer behavior, and quantify observations.

Converse with Your Sales Team

National and local internet marketing experts know who the real experts are in anecdotal evidence. Work closely with the sales team to figure out which aspects of marketing customers like as well as which aspects of marketing could be stronger. Customers build rapport with sales personnel, especially in B2B transactions. Additionally, customers are more likely to give honest feedback to sales personnel they know well on an impromptu basis.

Take a Systematic Approach

Instead of throwing data at others, slow down and take a systematic approach. In reality, any number of different variables that have nothing to do with a local internet marketing campaign could prompt a notable boost in sales. However, it is easy to calculate and display a reasonable margin of error. If a new spike in sales can be attributed to PR rather than internet marketing, it is important to recognize it. The end goal is to show the impact of marketing on returns, not prove that a current marketing campaign is optimal.

Show the CEO What Works and Why

It is important to recognize that few executives speak SEO or national to local internet marketing lingo. They are more concerned with the overall state of the business, as well they should be. They’re in charge of the grander scheme while you’re there for the inner workings. Similarly, it is important to recognize that a potentially golden idea for a Twitter or Instagram marketing campaign can easily get lost if the message is not delivered in a clear way. The communication process has to be broken down into a few simple steps.
1.      Conduct baseline analyses of important metrics and existing sales channels.
2.      Work closely with the sales team to develop more effective marketing strategies.
3.      Identify variables not related to any given marketing campaign.
4.      Conduct new analyses of the same variables and the same sales channels over a reasonable period of time.
It is integral to clearly show change that resulted directly from new marketing. Use historic sales data to make an argument more compelling. Perhaps the fourth quarter has always been the strongest. Find a way to show why new marketing initiatives made it stronger. Separate other variables that are not part of the marketing campaign to further refine how much revenue is derived from marketing campaigns, and only marketing campaigns.

Key Takeaways

  • Use historic sales data to support claims that marketing drives revenue
  • Partner with the sales team to get honest feedback from customers
  • Work to identify variables not related to marketing in order to get accurate results
  • Clearly communicate the benefit of online marketing strategy to upper management

(via)

Friday, October 4, 2013

Top Search Result = Poor Ad CTR [Study]

Advertising network Chitika released a study today that showed how ad click-through rates on a website vary when users come to that website from Position 1 in the organic search results versus other positions. Data showed the highest CTR on ads in a website occured when users found the site from Position 10 in the SERPs.
ctr-by-referring-position
As a follow up to Chitika's study last summer that showed how rankings yielded traffic, Chitika said this is a stark contrast in terms of ad performance.
"What is clear from the data set is that although the first position of a Google search result drives the most search traffic, an average visitor coming from that link is the least likely to convert into an ad click," according to Chitika.
Chitika said the reason why Position 10 might be driving the most ad CTR on a site could be due to unsatisfactory results.
"When a user scrolls down and clicks on a link at Position 10, it is more likely that they have not found what they were looking for, increasing the probability of that person clicking on an ad related to their search query," Chitika said.
Chitika said that marketers shouldn't necessarily be vying for 10th position on every keyword, but that in terms of driving ad revenue, it's not a bad place to be overall.
google-results-page-rank-average-traffic-share-chart
"On a popular search term, 2.4 percent of potential visitors still represents a sizable audience, and by being the number 10 result, it's likely a site will see higher ad revenues," Chitika said in its report. "However, for lower volume or specialized search terms, ranking as high as possible will help in attracting the largest audience, since the proverbial 'pie' of users on those terms is already fairly small, along with the potential revenue impact of higher visitor CTRs."
So what's a marketer to do with this data? Cristian Potter, a data solutions engineer at Chitika, said it's important to note that this report examines aggregate traffic trends, and may not apply to groups of sites.
"Hitting the sweet spot requires some analysis of an individual site's traffic, for example, understanding how users are finding the site, and how certain campaigns have impacted actions undertaken by users on the site itself," Potter said. He added that this research can serve as a "as a point of reference in plotting metrics and key performance indicators."
While the data seemed to show an interesting relationship, sites that go after ad revenue have a seemingly delicate balance of providing a great user experience and making money. Not having the most relevant content (Position 10 versus Position 1) and subsequently driving users away through an ad doesn't seem like a great idea, either.
Potter agreed.
"User experience is always a key consideration when it comes to deciding on the number and placement of ad units," Potter said. "This also ties in with expected CPM on each ad unit - it should be worth the site's while to place an ad in a prime position. However, this study was solely behavior focused. The characteristics of the one or more ad units on each site within the sample will have varied considerably."

(via)

Friday, April 19, 2013

Search Ad Revenues Hit Record $16.9 Billion in 2012 [Report]


Search ad revenues once again broke records in 2012. Search remained the revenue leader at $16.9 billion, accounting for 46 percent of all Internet advertising revenue, although this figure doesn't even include mobile search ads in the Internet Advertising Bureau's 2012 report.
top-ad-formats-2011-2012-iab
In 2011, search advertising accounted for $14.8 billion (46.3 percent of all digital advertising).
The IAB noted this year's 14.5 percent increase in revenue was "slightly below the overall industry growth of 15.2%, likely due to a shift to Mobile Search, now captured in the Mobile format."
The new Mobile advertising format ($3.4 billion, 9 percent of revenues) basically lumps together any ads that appear on mobile devices (smartphones, feature phones, and tablets), including display, text messaging, search, and audio/video ads. So while "search" was "slightly below" industry growth, it's likely due to the IAB's own format change.
quarterly-revenue-growth-1996-2012
Overall, the IAB reported total U.S. advertising profits of $36.6 billion for 2012 – up from $31.7 billion in 2011. Also noteworthy: Q4 2012 revenues surpassed $10 billion for the first time.
Elsewhere, display advertising revenues accounted for $12 billion (33 percent) of revenues in 2012, up from $11.1 billion (dropping from 34.8 percent overall) in 2011.
The IAB's numbers come from its twice annual Internet Advertising Revenue Report. IAB officials sponsor the study, which is performed independently by the new media group PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

(via)

Saturday, October 13, 2012

IAB Report Shows Search Still Accounts for Lion’s Share of Online Ad Revenue


The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) has released its first half of 2012 Internet Advertising Revenue Report conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers and it is good reading.
Considering our audience it will please you to know that despite cries of the death of SEO and the move to social leaving all other ad forms behind, search still accounts for 47% of the ad revenue from the Internet space as measured in this report. The report states ‘Search revenues totaled $4.1 billion in Q2 2012, up 17% from Q2 2011, when Search totaled $3.5 billion’. Sounds healthy to me.
Here is a breakdown v. last year’s results. Notice the move made by mobile.