Showing posts with label Forrester Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forrester Research. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

It’s the year of mobile but not the mobile ad

How often use a smartphone
A mobile device used to be a luxury, an item that only the geeky few would own let alone use on a daily basis. But now you’re the odd man out if you don’t have a mobile phone in your pocket. Check out these stats from Forrester Research:

  • More than 2 billion smartphones installed worldwide
  • They’re in the hands of 31.3% of the world’s population
  • Massive usage in three countries: More than 64% in the UK, 64% in the US, and 66% in Hong Kong.
  • Three-quarters use their smartphone to access the internet at least once a day.
This is great news for marketers, right? Well, it would be if we weren’t going backward through the history of online marketing.
Think about the last advertisement you saw on your phone? I’ll bet it was a banner ad. Even if it wasn’t, that’s the ad that stuck in your mind because they’re annoying on mobile. Without even realizing it, you might have seen an ad for a movie or TV show or a new beauty product. You might not remember the ad because it blended so seamlessly with the content it didn’t stick out in your mind.
So. . . memorable is bad and blending in is good. This is a topsy turvy world we’re living in but it’s true. We have to find ways of getting our message across without annoying the masses.
(via)

Monday, August 13, 2012

The Real Value of a Facebook Like


Trying to qualify the value of a Facebook Like for a given brand has been shown to be an incredibly elusive and often frustrating exercise. An exercise many brand managers and marketing managers would say ends more often than not, in futility.
Sure, having that large number of Facebook Likes is always great for the ego while standing around the water cooler with the brand managers and marketers – but what is the inherent value?
What good are all these Likes if it doesn’t correlate to increased revenue?
Two recent studies have shed some light on what the value of a Facebook Like truly is:
“The Facebook Factor” via Forrester and the “Power of a Like 2” the sequel to comScore’s “Power of a Like” released last year.

Each study examines the use of Facebook across several large, retail brands.
Released earlier this year, “The Facebook Factor” takes a hard look at the impact of a Facebook fan on brand interactions for four very large, well-known brands: Best Buy, Coca-Cola, Walmart and Blackberry.
Using the Best Buy results as one example, take a look at the startling difference between someone who Likes a given brand on Facebook vs. someone who does not:
The Real Value of a Facebook Like
The dollar amounts above reflect the average amount someone who Likes Best Buy on Facebook will spend over the course of 12 months vs. how much who does NOT Like them over the same timeframe.
So think about this… someone who Likes Best Buy on Facebook is going to spend, on average, over $200 more per year PLUS are nearly 100% more likely to recommend Best Buy to a friend or relative.
I would say these are very telling statistics wouldn’t you? Similar results were also seen across the other three brands in the Forrester research.
As for the “Power of a Like 2” it’s important to take a quick look back the original, the “Power of a Like” which revealed that Facebook Fans or Likes of a given brand, along with their friends, tend to be that given brand’s best customers.
The original study also pointed out that compared to the average Internet user, Facebook Fans are also heavy users of a brand’s products.
Ironically, the “Power of Like 2” also used Best Buy as one of their “test subjects” and their results were very similar to what Forrester uncovered, showing Best Buy Fans spend on average 131% more in Best Buy stores and online than those who are not Fans of Best Buy.
Ok, So Now What?
The quick-trigger reaction of some reading this will be to go out and try and accumulate as many Facebook Fans or Likes they can with the thought being ‘the more the merrier’ or more precisely ‘the more the merrier we will be for we will sell more products!’
But before you run out and instruct your social media managers to go forth and find any and all people to Like your brand on Facebook regardless of who they are –stop and remember what you learned in marketing class re: demographics.
From the Forrester findings…
“Profile and target your Facebook fans. Use demographics, marketing preferences, and online and retail behaviors to tailor your marketing strategy to them. Your fans are among your highest value customers — they spend more, and they are advocates of your brand. Target your customer retention marketing strategy to appeal to these valuable customers.”
(via)

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Takeaways From Forrester’s 2012 CMO Study


This month, Forrester published “The Evolved CMO, 2012,” a 15-page study highlighting the salient data and issues facing today’s Chief Marketing Officer. The joint research project by Forrester Research and Heidrick & Struggles presents four critical opportunities for CMOs:
  • Beef up digital and technical understanding
  • Partner with and lead peers on the executive team
  • Increase focus on retention in addition to acquisition strategies
  • Align with sales and service leaders to drive the brand experience throughout the organization.”
The study also explores each of these four points and it would really benefit any CMO (and their partner) to commit them to memory. However, I’d argue a closer analysis of two areas: evolution of the CMO and internal support networks is equally important and thus should be added to the list.
Chief Marketing Officer, PHD:
Overlapping skillsets, ambiguous job functions and technological innovation requires that the CMO role evolve – and keep evolving. Understanding digital behavior has become a prerequisite and the CMO must be a “technologist” as well as marketer so they can understand key data and strategically target their markets effectively.
The CMO is evolving into “the professor” of the company; someone CEOs look to for sage “company IP” or knowledge of the customer lifecycle, direction on targeting the market and positioning of moving the customer conversation into the digital world.  The Chief Information Officer is arguably the over-qualified assistant professor; battle-tested and a wealth of technical resource and support. Both must collaborate regularly to execute sound strategies based on interpreting an increasingly complex and real-time set of data. What’s more, if the CIO can’t understand the customers pain points (through the eyes of the sage CMO), they most likely fail.
Only a symbiotic, trusted relationship where the talents of both the CMO and CIO are applied, will result in a successful tenure.  As the CMO role continues to expand with more responsibility (and BOD participation) so will their average tenure follow (or so I think…).
Flexibility and Support from Within:
CMOs must remain flexible and nimble as their very job description is changing. At closer analysis, increasingly, the evolved CMO resembles the CEO. Therefore,  it’s no coincidence many CMOs go on to become successful CEOs of their organizations when they have years of business leadership, revenue, advocacy and technical adoption acumen under their belt. Skills essential to customer engagement and retention come in handy when leading an organization too.
Don’t forget the Chief Financial Officer. The CFO needs to show the attention and respect to the CMO now more than ever.  This isn’t an entirely popular idea. Customer-driven organizations with CFOs who don’t recognize that importance should consider a new CFO that sees the customer and brand value on par with the CMO. They are far more critical today to the overall growth of the company based on the customer and brand value – and thus no longer that easy to replace. However this may be the only viable solution. Hey, it’s just business.
(via)