Showing posts with label yahoo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label yahoo. Show all posts

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Fake Googlebot Activity up 61% [Report]

Just in time for the annual security conferences of Black Hat and Defcon in Las Vegas, Nevada, Incapusla Security has released their latest report on the state of Googlebot (and it's evil malicious twin). The news isn't good for those of us who spend our days staring at website statistics.
For every 24 Googlebot visits a website will also be visited by a Fake Googlebot
Malicious activity is up 61 percent, and one in every 24 visits is a fake bot. More than 34 percent are used for DDoS attacks, hacking, scraping, spamming, or other malicious activities.
So what does this mean for you?

Methodology

Incapsula studied:
...over 400 million search engine visits to 10,000 sites, resulting in over 2.19 billion page crawls over a 30 day period.
Information about Googlebot impostors (a.k.a., Fake Googlebots) comes from inspection of more than 50 million Googlebot impostor visits, as well as findings from our 'DDoS Threat Landscape' report, published earlier this year.

Incapsula's Findings

The average website is visited by 187 Googlebots a day
When Incapsula looked at the standard Googlebot, there were some interesting discoveries.
First of note is that Googlebot crawls more pages than all other search engines combined at 60.5 percent.
Search Engine bots Share of Total Page Crawls
What they found when analyzing these visits was also a bit unexpected.
  • Yahoo has dropped out of the top five crawlers or engines.
  • Majestic 12 Bot, or Majestic SEO's bot webcrawler, has taken fourth place.
  • Google doesn't play favorites.
  • There is virtually no correlation between site size and
    • Crawl frequency.
    • Crawl rates.
    • Crawl depth.
    • SEO performance.
Googlebot listens to the little guy
We know Google is the largest generator of bot visits to your site, that these visits are triggered by something other than site activity and SEO performance, and that they "listen" to the little guy.
All in all, pretty good. But it isn't Google we're troubled by; it's his "evil" twins we need to be cautious about (there may be many – some of them quite perfectly done).

User-Agents

The way we tell what bots are visiting our sites is to look up the user agent or calling cards, in our log files. When we see the corresponding user agent we know the visits came from what OS, computer type and what browser. For example, a user agent might look like this:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/30.0
This information can tell us someone used Mozilla/Firefox 30 on a MacIntosh with Mavericks OS. It can also tell spiders, programs and bots. It is also how we validate who is running around on our sites.

Impersonating Google – a Bot's life

In their review, Incapsula found that "over 4% of bots operating with Googlebot's HTTP(S) user-agent are not who they claim to be." And the big winner was Brazil, which had a bad Googlebot rate at almost 14 percent.

Bad Bots

Why would anyone care about sending out a fake Googlebot?
Well, it's sort of like having a fake ID when you're 18. Sometimes you just want to hang out, most of the time it means something your mother wouldn't like is going on.
Fake Googlebot is the 3rd most common bot used for DDos attacks
Googlebot Imposters by Type of Activity

Not All Bots Are Bad

You will want to keep in mind that not all bots are bad bots with nefarious intent. A fake bot doesn't always have malicious intent. Some are used for just using the Googlebot to view your site as Google would and then putting that data to work in objects like tools.
So before you block a bot, check its behaviors out. Is it simply crawling? Is it sending itself over and over (DOS (Denial of Service attack)), randomized (could be penetration testing for holes to exploit)?
Once you determine that it is a bad bot you will want to block their access. Be careful however you could wind up blocking Google, so make sure what you block is bot specific.

How Do You Know When You're Getting Faked Visits?

One of the key indicators for most site owners that there are issues afoot are the countries of origin in your Analytics organic traffic.
Where Fake Googlebot and Googlebot Come From
A normal distribution of the top six countries likely to visit your U.S. site is on the right, the one with fake Googlebot on the left. Now, if you target countries in the left side, it's perfectly normal for you to have these in your distribution. If not, you're mostly likely having an issue.
If you see this, make sure to check your server logs and the user agents and see if you have an attack underway. If so, and you don't have access to the servers, make sure to talk to the company that does, so they can block this for you.

Identifying Bad Bots Isn't Too Hard

The good news is that mostof the time it isn't that difficult to identify the bad bot – once that is done, you can block it and keep it off your site.
That is ifyou have the power, rights, and access. Most site owners don't and must rely on their hosting company, which is why it is so important you pick one that is security readied and knowledgeable.
If you do have access, you can take these steps to verify the bot activity is actually occurring and then use this same information to block them.

How to Identify the Bad Bot?

Identifying bad bots can be tricky; some are very sophisticated, especially the ones mimicking Google. Here are some steps you can take to verify their presence.

Beating the Bot

From Incapsula and their study:
Step 1: Looking at Header Data
In this case, even though the bots were using Google's own user-agent, the rest of the header data was very "un-Google like". This was enough to raise the "red flag", but not to issue a blocking decision because our algorithms account for scenarios where Google deviates from the usual header structure.
Step 2: IP and ASN verification
Next on our checklist was the IP and ASN verification process. Here we looked for a couple of things, including the identity of the owners of the IPs and the ASNs that are producing the now suspicious traffic.
In this case, neither the IPs nor the ASN belonged to Google. So, by cross-verifying this information with the already dubious headers, the system was able to determine – with a high degree of certainty – that it was dealing with potentially dangerous impostors.
Step 3: Behavior Monitoring
However, "potentially dangerous" doesn't always equal "malicious". For example, we know that some SEO tools will try to pass themselves off as Googlebot to gain a "Google-like" perspective of a site's content and link profile.
This is why the next thing we look for is the visitors' behavior, in an attempt to uncover their intent. Clues to such intent often come from the request itself, as it gets profiled by our WAF. In this case, the sheer rate of visits was enough to complete the picture, immediately pointing toa DDoS attack and raising the automated anti-DDoS defenses.
Step 4: IP Reputation and New Low-Level Signature
Although this wasn't our first encounter with fake Googlebots, this specific signature variant wasn't part of our existing database. Even as the attack was being mitigated, our system used the collected data to create a new Low-Level Signature which was then added to our 10M+ pool of signatures and propagated across our network to protect all Incapsula clients.
As a result, the next time these bots will come to visit, they will be immediately blocked. Moreover, the reputation of the attacking IPs was also recorded and added to a different database, where we keep data about all potentially dangerous IPs.
Simply put, you must be aware that user-agents can be fake, IPs can be spoofed, headers can be re-modeled and so on. And so, to provide reliable identification, you need to cross-verify various tell-tale signs to uncover the visitors' true identity and intentions.

Summary

Googlebots Country of Origin
Keep an eye on your organic traffic, especially countries of origin. When something is afoot, make sure to get in there and deal with your bot's intentions. Just be careful not to keep the good guys at bay.
(via)

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

AdWords gets dynamic, Yahoo gets Flurry and more



Adwords dyanmic links
AdWords, Yahoo, and don’t forget Google.

Let’s finish up the week with a couple of quick hits.
AdWords is adding deep linking, dynamic sitelinks to search ads. The links are automatically generated and added to the bottom of your existing ad based on searcher behavior.
For example:
When people use Google to search for used cars, they may perform multiple searches and click on several search results before scheduling a test drive on a dealer’s site. While searching, they might see an ad for Joe’s Used Cars with a dynamic sitelink for the test drive page on Joe’s website, based on the customer’s current search activity.
Nice way to get a relevant call to action without any additional effort on your part. (Other than a website with a variety of actionable content pages.)
 Yahoo!
Earlier this week, Yahoo declared their intentions to court mobile ad exchange network Flurry.
Our agreement to acquire Flurry is a meaningful step for the company and reinforces Yahoo’s commitment to building and supporting useful, inspiring and beautiful mobile applications and monetization solutions.
Here’s what Flurry is bringing to the marriage:
Over 170,000 developers are using the Flurry platform for analytics, ad monetization and traffic acquisition. Together, they have over 540,000 applications on our platform. That number has been constantly increasing since 2008 and it is showing no signs of stopping.
Yahoo is bringing around $200 million, which seems a little light. We’ll see how it goes.
91,000 people now have the right to be forgotten
Back in May, Google began accepting removal requests as part of the whole “right to be forgotten” rule. They received requests from 91,000 individuals covering 328,000 URLs. Wall Street Journal reports that Google has since processed a little more than 50% of the requests.
Not all requests are getting processed. 30% of requests were rejected and Google asked for clarification on another 12%. That still leaves quite a few mentions that are going to be stricken from the record.
I’m not surprised so many people want their past cleaned up. I am surprised that the majority of claims are legit. I’m also surprised that we haven’t seen more protests from people who think the internet shouldn’t be censored.
That’s it for me. Have a great weekend. I’ll see you back here on Monday.

(via)

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Mobile Trends and Search Optimization: Why Aren’t We Catching Up?

As mobile search continues to grow at a rapid pace, we cannot miss the opportunity to become better mobile search practitioners.
When I think of the current state of mobile search practices, my mind flashes to dog racing. I'm not particularly a fan, but the image of those dogs chasing a mechanical rabbit reminds me of the current state of mobile search. Right now, the mobile consumer is the rabbit and marketers and technologists are the dogs - everyone's moving quickly and trying to keep up the pace.
Mobile purchases are expected to outpace desktop purchases in the near future. Juniper Research estimated that annual retail payments on mobile handsets and tablets should reach $707 billion by 2018. Yet, according to Uberflip, only 25 percent of brands have a mobile strategy. If mobile marketing is the coming supernova it's expected to be, why aren't more enterprises first-movers in the mobile space?

Mobile Consumer Behavior

Fifty-five percent of all time spent with online retail in June 2013 occurred on a mobile device. Add to that comScore's assertion that just more than 50 percent of time spent engaging with websites is being done on a mobile device, and you can see that paid, organic, and site optimization for mobile are paramount to global search success.
With thanks to mobiThinking.com, here are some additional data points regarding mobile behavior, specifically mobile search behavior:
  • 25 percent of overall search queries are now on mobile devices. - BIA/Kelsey (April 2014).
  • In the U.S., mobile accounted for 34.2 percent of all paid search clicks in December 2013. It is expected to be 42 percent by December 2014 and 50 percent by December 2015. - Marin Software (March 2014)
  • 58.7 percent of smartphone users access search; 73.9 percent of tablet users access search. -ComScore Mobile Future in Focus (March 2013).
  • During the 2014 Winter Olympic Games, 60 to 65 percent of Olympics-related searches were performed on a smartphone or tablet. - Google (April 2014).
  • The number of calls to businesses driven by mobile search is growing at 42 percent per annum and is predicted to fuel a staggering 65 billion calls in 2016. - BIA/Kelsey (April 2014).
To further push the notion that mobile search needs our full attention, Yahoo and Kenshoo partnered to survey 350 global marketers about their mobile marketing practices earlier this year. They revealed a stark reminder that multiscreen behavior is being driven by a negative impression of the mobile experience.
This is the first reason there aren't more first-movers. Marketers have been lagging when it comes to taking ownership over their mobile presence. As the BIA/Kelsey report showed, more than half of all mobile shoppers are low-funnel, high-intent buyers while searching. But if they arrive on a search result, landing page, or site not optimized for mobile use - click, they're gone. Solutions such as responsive Web design should make it easy to deploy mobile. So, where are we failing our mobile search audience? Part of the disconnect lies with search optimization practices.

Mobile Optimization: Thoughts to Consider

While many brands recognize the need for mobile optimization, adoption drop-off remains high because of a lack of cohesive, device-driven, activity-based strategies. Here are some of the more prominent issues facing mobile optimization neophytes.
  1. Consumers still buy locally. U.S. e-commerce still represents less than 10 percent of all retail spending, with the balance usually completed within 10 to 15 miles from home. What's changed is that mobile and Web searches are being used to find brick-and-mortar goods and services that will be purchased in-store. So, while online conversions are great, the reality is that we must optimize for offline conversions as much if not more heavily right now. How do we generate a call to the store? Can we drive a visit through our mobile presence? Effective optimization recognizes the pathways that connect search behavior to in-store activity. 
  2. Paid campaigns and site optimization deserve focus. Organic listings are being pushed further down the screen, below the fold, and Google has indicated that click-through rate (CTR) drops substantially after position four. While organic optimization is still relevant, a focus on paid campaigns and site structure is probably going to result in better return on investment (ROI).
  3. Authoring boosts results. Structured authoring for mobile, as it is for desktop applications, enables quick viewing and rapid response. What is the task at hand, what is the concept being delivered, what is the reference? The general objectives remain the same for both formats. However, the intent of the mobile user is very different from the "lean back" desktop user. Therefore, search optimization is dependent on authoring that renders a result that encompasses low-funnel criteria mobile users invoke such as price, dimensions, inventory, etc. 
  4. Tagging for mobile activities. Tags targeting the nature of high-intent consumers will be more effective in mobile than for desktop. What do they want while searching for solutions? Quick, hard facts that can lead to a purchase or further activity within 60 minutes. Local calls-to-action, though a seemingly obvious tactic, aren't being considered when marketers create mobile campaigns. There still remains a lot of desktop mentality during migration to mobile search marketing when it comes to tagging landing and site pages. 
  5. Click- to- call features for all mobile sites. The rise of click-to-call appeal to mobile consumers has been met with a stunning lack of deployment by many brands. Search is inexorably linked with inbound calls on a local level. For many services (IT, financial services, home improvement, especially) and complex goods verticals, qualifying calls to local merchants are required to make a sale. Therefore, it makes sense to leverage mobile search (site, paid and organic) with click-to-call functionality.
The second reason there aren't more first-movers into the mobile marketing space is the Hummingbird-spawned move to semantic search.

How Semantic Search Influences Mobile Optimization

The evolution of semantic search poses the same challenges for mobile as it does for desktop. But mobile searchers are typically more oriented to navigational searches than research searches. In other words, they are using search to retrieve actionable information, such as a store location or product price, rather than attempting to explore any resource for information about an unknown. Therefore, the contextual attributes that exist for mobile semantic search are more likely to be structured around factors like geo-location and prior browsing activity.

Readability

Remember, we want to develop content that meets the two readability standards: those of the user and spider. The user is looking for action, while the spider is looking for relevance. Just as with desktop, Hummingbird has moved mobile optimization to a contextual approach. So metadata, page content, site structure, etc. that are built around conversational queries will tend to have better visibility and higher engagement.
For example, site pages filled with action-driving copy like "protect your skin" and "limit sun exposure" on clickable content within a skin care mobile site provides context for search engines and engagement for visitors.
Semantic search will drive localized SERPs. This, in turn, drives the need for sharper location-based optimization, which serves a more personalized experience that meets the local consumer on their terms, using their devices to shop locally.

Page Design Impact

On-page elements enable the user experience. Effective element attribution can lower the historically high abandonment rates by mobile users. Rendering instructions deploy page design elements, such as font size and color, background, white space, and other on-page characteristics. Mobile users seek a formatted page that fully displays on the horizontal axis and has robust functionality. Page rendering should quickly adapt to mobile access. Load speed is incredibly important, so is element positioning. Clean design attributes like simple navigation, concise copy, and lean imagery help drive mobile engagement. "Heavy" content such as video feeds must quickly orient, load, and stream seamlessly.
Mobile searchers look for different content cues on devices. Buttons, sliders, and image links move traffic on a smartphone. (Beware, the same doesn't hold true for feature phones.) HTML5-designed mobile sites rely heavily on CSS3 to deliver unique page views across smartphones, feature phones, tablets, and phablets. But you don't have to be immersed in code to optimize for mobile deployment. Best-in-breed tools like Adobe's Muse CC makes it easy for Web design neophytes to create a mobile site without code.
When it comes to page design, you should consider that searchers may use multiple devices for one purpose. For example, a person searching for a new vehicle on his smartphone during a lunch break may wish to return to a page on the home desktop after work. Chrome's multi-device features make this easy. Responsive design (or dedicated mobile sites) allows you to deliver the appropriate page layout for each device. Optimizing for multi-device search flow enables a better user experience with your brand.

Social

Google has shown us that social activity, while not an official ranking factor yet, is a signal that must be accounted for in the mobile space. Semantic search optimization is important in your social campaigns as well. Social activity that is optimized for mobile viewing gets more engagement, leading to higher visibility through indexing relevancy. (Hint: video, apps, images, and links that connect followers to other mobile-centric content is typically more effective when it comes to mobile ranking.)
Within the desktop environment, search has long been the primary conduit providing a path for our brands to reach consumers. The time where we must put emphasis on our mobile search marketing practices is here. The mobile generation has sprouted quickly and is demanding. We've got to adapt to the change that this movement has thrust upon us.

(via)

Monday, May 12, 2014

Local Listing Management Priorities: How & Where to Syndicate Local Data

Multi-location businesses face unique challenges in the management, optimization, and distribution of local business listing information. Accuracy is critical for every business, but those with a number of locations must also master scale.
It's easy to get bogged down in spreadsheets and a hodgepodge of tools. After all, most marketers struggle to see the ROI from local campaigns, so it can be difficult to justify putting budget here to streamline your efforts. You might simply rely on Yext, or have an agency do the work for you.
My last column looked at on-page validation or SEO factors, local landing page user experience, and local listing management together as components of your blueprint for multi-location brand success. This post will dive deeper into local data syndication – where to focus your efforts, how to do it properly, and scaling your efforts for maximum ROI.
Local Listing Management












Monday, April 21, 2014

SEO & PPC Q1 2014 Trends

It’s that time of year when Q1 “state of” reports are published to demonstrate where 2014 stands today.
On the organic side of things, reports show “(not provided)” keyword data in Google is holding strong at about 85 percent, and has since October 2013, according to RKG’s Digital Marketing 2014 Q1 report.
On the paid side, smartphone cost per click continues to be less overall than tablet and desktop at $0.76 versus $0.93 and $0.94 respectively, according to The Search Agency’s State of Paid Search Q1 2014 report.
Let’s look at some highlights of both those reports. 

Organic Search: What's Trending for Q1?

Yahoo’s move to secure search impacted 1 percent of all site visits, according to data from RKG. 
yahoo-secure-search-q1-rkg
“Over the first two weeks in January, Yahoo organic’s measurable share of all site visits dropped from 2.5 percent to 1.5 percent. During the first week of February, Yahoo traffic appears to rebound as a result of referrers, now stripped of search queries, being passed again,” RKG stated in its report. 
The iPad and iPhone each drove more organic search visits than all Android devices combined, RKG data showed. iPad users drove 12 percent of all the mobile organic search visits in Q1 (31 percent). iPhone users contributed to 11 percent, while all Android devices combined only accounted for 8 percent.
mobile-device-traffic-q1-rkg
The bounce rate for mobile search, however, is 5 percent higher than desktop overall. “The gap between the two device classes has been a persistent one with this quarter’s results mirroring performance from two years earlier,” RKG said in its report.
mobile-bounce-rate-q1-2014-rkg
Social media sites contributed to an average of 1.5 percent of all site visits, RKG reported. Facebook reigned as the dominant referrer of that traffic at 54 percent in Q1, versus other social sites like Pinterest (25 percent), YouTube (3 percent) and more. 
social-traffic-q1-rkg
For more trends in digital marketing, including stats on comparison shopping engines, paid search and display and more, you can access the RKG report here.

Paid Search: The Q1 Status

Year-over-year (YoY) spend was up for paid search advertisers in Q1 including all device types, according to The Search Agency. “Much of the YoY growth can also be attributed to Bing, which experienced steady growth in spend over the past five quarters,” the report stated. 
all-search-engines-spend-the-search-agency
In fact, spend on Bing grew 60 percent YoY, according to The Search Agency’s data. This was more than Google’s 29 percent growth, the report said. 
google-and-bing-spend-the-search-agency
RKG also found spending on Bing Ads up 17 percent YoY.
“Bing is beginning to represent an increasingly appealing alternative to Google because of its less competitive bidding environment (lower CPCs) and increasingly effective traffic (growing CTR),” The Search Agency reported. “Advertisers may also be drawn to Bing’s more flexible campaign management in the aftermath of Google’s crossover to enhanced campaigns. Advertisers are still adjusting to Google’s bundling of device management, and Bing may represent a more customizable alternative.”
Overall, cost per click was up in Q1 for all search engines from the same time last year at $0.91, but down from the seasonal spikes of Q4 2013, which came in at $1.12 per click on average, according to The Search Agency. 
cpc-all-search-engines-the-search-agency
When it came to which device experienced the most impression growth, it’s no surprise mobile came out on top with a 60 percent change YoY. Tablets grew 42 percent, while desktop grew 9 percemt. 
impressions-by-device-yoy-the-search-agency
(via)

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

How Google Encrypted Search Will Affect Your Business Online

Google has been going through a lot of changes of late. We touched on this in this week’s Friday Hangout but I’d like to expand on it a bit here too. Here’s the breakdown on Google Encrypted search and what it will mean for businesses online.

What is Google Encrypted Search? 

Encrypted search was introduced in 2010 to keep the information of logged in users secure. (Gmail and Chrome users, for example) Now that security has been expanded to everyone who searches using Google, at least in the US.

Google says: “When you search on https://www.google.com, an encrypted connection is created between your browser and Google. This secured channel helps protect your search terms and your search results pages from being intercepted by a third party on your network. “
That sounds good to those of us who are wary of sharing our search data with every website we visit. Keyword data will be secure and not passed to site owners. But for the owner of the site this eliminates the ability to track users and segment them by the keywords they used to find it. It’s a major blow to marketing tools which help us analyze traffic into the website and direct them to products or services based on keywords they used to get there.  Hubspot blogger Pamela Vaughn says marketers may lose all of their keyword based marketing data.
How will we know? 
If you’ve noticed a larger number of visits to your site labeled “organic,” “direct,” ”unknown,” or ”not provided,” that’s a sign your starting to see the changes reflected in your traffic. Data collection site NotProvided.com is tracking Google Analytics data from 60 websites  including B2B and B2C. The image below shows their tracking of “not provided” keywords on those sites and they predict that these sites may be reporting 100% not provided keywords as early as November 2013.

google encrypted search
What about AdWords? 
Keyword data will still be passed on to Google AdWords advertisers. So if you’re running AdWords on your account you can still get keyword data. Connect Adwords to Analytics and use the data to focus your marketing the way you should have all along anyway, by focusing rich content around the keywords you want to target. People are still going to find your site  based on the keywords they enter in a search. You just won’t know what hose keywords are.

What else can we do? 
Start paying more attention to other search engines like Bing and Yahoo. Users are probably not going to stop using Google as a search engine because Google is no longer giving out their keyword data, but you can still  use what other search engines tell you about your website to fine-tune for all search engines.

Run an AdWords campaign so you can use that data to check on your keyword optimization.
Create pages that are rich in content that is relevant to the people who would typically search for it and raising authentic organic content across the board.
Use focused landing pages to help users self-segment and create marketing channels based on what site visitors want.
Create content offers like downloadable white-papers to attract users and use custom landing pages and follow-up emails to channel the right information to those prospects

(via)